The most delicious nameko, scientifically proven!Masuno gives an example of how this focus on diversity over intensity might be achieved, through his involvement in the development of a `more delicious` nameko strain. The history of nameko production in Japan has followed the trend of other major species: a large increase in production with automation and the development of efficient strains, demand failing to keep pace, meaning a slow fall or stagnation in prices over the past 30 years. What if, however, this trend could be stopped, or even reversed, by expanding consumption and demand based on deliciousness, and without a `race to the bottom`?
On the surface, selecting for a new strain of nameko based on `taste` over harvest quantity or incubation time might seem like a lost cause, give the inherent subjectivity involved; taste, after all, is a complex result of various factors, including intangible ones such as memory, environment, culture, and so on. Masuno`s team, however, focused on the material factors they could measure, as a means of approaching an objective analysis of taste using a `taste sensor`. This device makes use of an artificial lipid membrane to analyse the interaction between the taste material and the membrane, to distinguish between salty, sour, bitter, astringent, and umami, as well as initial taste and aftertaste. Using this system, Masuno and his team set up a baseline for what could be considered a `delicious` nameko fruiting body, using a freshly harvested wild nameko which was widely regarded by foragers to be a fine specimen, and then taking measurements using the taste sensor as a baseline for `delicious`, notably low in bitterness and off tastes, and with strong umami. Using this, they were not only able to analyse a wide variety of different nameko strains to work out which best matched this `delicious` baseline, but also to examine how different parts of the transport and storage process preserved (or degraded) flavour away from the baseline.
Masuno does not go into detail into how such research could be practically incorporated into a more diverse mushroom industry, but we can perhaps imagine how it might lead to the development of lower-yielding strains that can fetch a higher price as premium varieties, marketed on their culinary qualities, and likely with a stronger link between a producer and their local market (whether individuals, restaurants, or other buyers). Ultimately, this is one method of giving the industry a bit of `breathing room`: expanding the definition of what a mushroom is (what value it has, how it can be used, who can consume it), and allowing for a wider range of producers to find a niche and make a living, even amongst a backdrop of generally falling demand.